Oregon has a reporting duty, but a much narrower one than Minnesota's.
The Toxic-Free Kids program requires biennial reports, and PFOS and PFOA-related substances sit on Oregon's high-priority chemicals list — but it applies only to children's products and only to listed chemicals above de minimis, so it is not the general all-products duty Minnesota imposes. Confusing the two is the usual error: Oregon reporting has existed since 2018 and catches very few manufacturers who are not already selling children's goods. Separately, PFAS-containing foam food packaging has been prohibited since 2025 and cosmetics follow under the Toxic-Free Cosmetics Act in 2027.
Reporting Req.effective January 1, 2018
Oregon's Toxic-Free Kids program requires biennial reports when children's products contain listed chemicals of concern — the list includes PFOS and PFOA-related PFAS.
Covers: Toys & children's products · Juvenile products
Cadence: Biennial reporting of listed high-priority chemicals in children's products, via the IC2 HPCDS portal.
Applies only to chemicals on Oregon's HPCCCH list (which includes PFOS and PFOA-related substances) above de minimis — narrower than 'all PFAS'.
Bannedeffective January 1, 2025
Oregon banned PFAS-containing foam food packaging from 2025.
Covers: Food packaging
Bannedeffective January 1, 2027
Oregon's Toxic-Free Cosmetics Act bans intentionally added PFAS in cosmetics from January 1, 2027.
Covers: Cosmetics · Personal care products
Informational, not legal advice. Rules marked “verify” or “under legal challenge” are exactly that, check the linked source or ask counsel before relying.