PFASMatrix
Aug 16, 2026extension cutoffSep 15, 2026MN reports dueDec 14, 2026extended deadline

The Minnesota Sprint:your Sept 15 filing, done with you.

Fixed fee, capacity-limited, no software to learn. We run the supplier chase, build your evidence record, and hand you a PRISM-ready package — with the extension path covered if the calendar wins.

$950
early cohort · one-time · $1,450 after
+ the state’s own $800 filing fee, paid directly to Minnesota

Applicability review

Your full catalog mapped against Minnesota + 15 other states — what's reportable, what's banned where, what needs a label.

Supplier outreach, run for you

We draft and send attestation requests for up to 20 suppliers, chase non-responders on a schedule, and normalize every answer.

Evidence log

Every request and response lands in a due-diligence record — the documentation Minnesota's 'continued efforts' standard expects.

PRISM-ready package

Component-level data in the state's format: correct grouping, the exact concentration ranges from Minn. R. 7026.0030, chemical names matched to the state list, unknowns handled the way the rule allows.

Extension help if needed

If Sept 15 isn't realistic, we prepare your extension request before the Aug 16 cutoff — moving you to Dec 14.

3 months of Growth included

When the software ships, your data is already in it — deadline calendar, annual Feb 1 updates, Washington's Jan 31, 2027 report next.

Request a spot

Early cohort is capped. We reply within one business day.

No payment collected online yet — we confirm fit first, then invoice.

Straight answers

Who is this for?+

Consumer brands with roughly 5–200 SKUs — cookware, outdoor gear, apparel, juvenile products, cosmetics — without a compliance department. If you have 2,000 SKUs and a regulatory team, you want enterprise software, and we'll say so on the call.

What if my suppliers don't respond in time?+

Minnesota's rule anticipates this: you file best-available information, mark unknowns the way PRISM allows, and keep documented proof you kept asking. That proof is exactly what the sprint produces.

What if it turns out we have nothing to report?+

That's a good outcome — and you'll have the supplier attestations to prove it, which is what a retailer audit or a 'PFAS-free' claim challenge will ask for. The applicability review and evidence log are the value either way.

Why is payment offline?+

We're deliberately capacity-limited (supplier chasing is real work) and we confirm fit on a 20-minute call before taking money. You'll get an invoice after the call; $950 for the early cohort, $1,450 after.